From: | Cliff Nieuwenhuis <cliff(at)nieusite(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: encoding problems |
Date: | 2008-03-11 19:07:40 |
Message-ID: | 200803111407.40621.cliff@nieusite.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice pgsql-patches |
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 11:41:35 Tom Lane wrote:
> Cliff Nieuwenhuis <cliff(at)nieusite(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not sure how to ask this question. I have written a function, and
> > with PostgreSQL 8.0.13 I can do a "\df+" and see something like this
> > under Source Code:
> > DECLARE
> > result text;
> > ...
> >
> > If I create the same function on my computer running PostgreSQL 8.3.0 and
> > try the \df+ then the Source Code shows:
> >
> > \x09DECLARE
> > \x09\x09result text;
> > ...
>
> That's not an encoding problem, that's an intentional behavioral change
> in the way that psql formats strings for display.
>
> I guess it's a bit annoying if you were hoping that tabs would be useful
> for pretty-printing purposes. Should we reconsider what's done with a
> tab in mbprint.c?
>
> regards, tom lane
My vote would be to go back to the old way, or at least have that as an option
of some sort. I use command-line psql all the time -- to me, psql offers the
same advantages as using a command-line interface for other work. I find the
extra characters really get in the way.
Thanks for the prompt reply!
--
Cliff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-11 19:45:01 | Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-11 18:15:05 | Re: Planning large IN lists |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-03-12 08:16:27 | Re: [NOVICE] encoding problems |
Previous Message | Joshua | 2008-03-11 17:25:54 | simple question concerning plpgsql and SQL Functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-11 19:11:09 | Re: TransactionIdIsInProgress() cache |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-11 18:07:27 | Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout |