Re: [PERFORM] multi-threaded pgloader makes it in version 2.3.0

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] multi-threaded pgloader makes it in version 2.3.0
Date: 2008-03-10 16:18:16
Message-ID: 200803101718.16866.dfontaine@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Hi,

Le samedi 01 mars 2008, Simon Riggs a écrit :
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:08 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > I'd like to have some feedback about the new version, in term of bugs
> > encountered and performance limitations (is pgloader up to what you would
> > expect a multi-threaded loader to be at?)
>
> Maybe post to general as well if you don't get any replies here.
> New feature is very important for us.

So, here's yet another mail about pgloader new 2.3.0 version, please forgive
me for being over zealous here if that's how I appear to be to you...

Those links will give you detailed information about the new release.
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgloader
http://pgfoundry.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=1283
http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/#_parallel_loading

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Flatt 2008-03-10 16:23:41 Re: restore_command %r option
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-03-10 16:08:08 Re: multi-threaded pgloader needs your tests

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rainer Pruy 2008-03-10 16:55:43 Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-03-10 16:08:08 Re: multi-threaded pgloader needs your tests