From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent |
Date: | 2008-03-06 16:32:03 |
Message-ID: | 200803061632.m26GW3L04395@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
> >> of prominence. Here's a V3 try
>
> > That one looks good to me. These are small details but better to get it
> > right now.
>
> OK, committed. Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
> description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?
I have tried to improve the GUC description for
"bgwriter_lru_multiplier"; applied to CVS HEAD.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 777 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-06 18:50:36 | Re: [GENERAL] advisory locks: documentation hint and feature request |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-06 15:39:05 | Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-03-06 17:17:28 | Intended behaviour of SET search_path with SQL functions? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-06 16:21:10 | Re: BUG #3909: src\tools\msvc\clean.bat clears parse.h file |