From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: List types |
Date: | 2008-03-05 16:03:49 |
Message-ID: | 20080305160349.GW5559@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:51:53AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:29:49 +0100
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:05:17PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Magnus Hagander
> > > <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > > > What's the difference between "Regional lists" and "User Groups
> > > > Lists"? I mean, we have persian pug under regional, but sydney
> > > > and portland under user groups... Should we just merge these?
> > > >
> > > > (http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/)
> > >
> > > The PUGs are supposed to be groups working on face to face events
> > > etc. The Regionals are actually a kind of mix of language and
> > > region-speciifc content.
>
> If we actually have a definition of each list. I would like to see us
> include that definition the page:
It doesn't right now, but it's easy enough to add it. I'll look at that
once we have agreement on what the categories shuold be :-) (See Selenas
mail)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-03-05 16:13:47 | Re: List types |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-05 15:51:53 | Re: List types |