From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
Cc: | Edwin Groothuis <postgresql(at)mavetju(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #3975: tsearch2 index should not bomb out of 1Mb limit |
Date: | 2008-03-05 15:53:38 |
Message-ID: | 200803051553.m25Frct09843@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>
> > Ouch. But... since very long words are already not indexed (is the length
> > configurable anywhere because I don't mind setting it to 50 characters), I
> > don't think that it should bomb out of this but print a similar warning like
> > "String only partly indexed".
> >
> This is not a bug. I would say it's a limitation. Look at
> src/include/tsearch/ts_type.h. You could decrease len in WordEntry to 9
> (512 characters) and increase pos to 22 (4 Mb). Don't forget to update
> MAXSTRLEN and MAXSTRPOS accordingly.
>
> > I'm still trying to determine how big the message it failed on was...
> >
> Maybe we should change the "string is too long for tsvector" to "string
> is too long (%ld bytes, max %ld bytes) for tsvector".
Good idea. I have applied the following patch to report in the error
message the string length and maximum, like we already do for long
words:
Old:
test=> select repeat('a', 3000)::tsvector;
ERROR: word is too long (3000 bytes, max 2046 bytes)
New:
test=> select repeat('a ', 3000000)::tsvector;
ERROR: string is too long for tsvector (1048576 bytes, max 1048575 bytes)
I did not backpatch this to 8.3 because it would require translation
string updates.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 3.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-05 16:20:32 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values |
Previous Message | Rodriguez Fernando | 2008-03-05 14:36:48 | Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-05 17:00:57 | Re: Endless recovery |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-05 15:20:27 | Re: WIP: guc enums |