Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: 2008-03-05 15:09:38
Message-ID: 200803051509.m25F9cs11343@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Richard Huxton wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> David Fetter wrote:
> >>>> If you really need to embed an
> >>>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent
> >>>> <a href="http://www.sqlite.org/">SQLite</a>
> >> or <a href="http://http://www.firebirdsql.org/">Firebird</a>
> >>
> >>>> for the purpose.
> >> Just to be fair.
> >
> > sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding.
>
> It's certainly the lightest DB I'm aware of, but Firebird does have an
> embedded mode (apparentl - I tend to use a different DB :-)

Right. The issue with Firebird is it does both embedded and
traditional, while sqlite is only embedded, so is probably a better
choice for that purpose.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-05 16:20:32 Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2008-03-05 15:05:30 Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres