| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
| Date: | 2008-03-05 18:30:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20080305103043.233761e8@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:25:00 -0800
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> It's good to explain why PG does what it does how it does it, and that
> should be in that section of the FAQ, but continuing, even by silence,
> with an answer equivalent to, "We don't do that. You shouldn't
> either. Tough $#!+" only makes us look bad, where suggesting
> alternatives for the use cases we don't cover makes us look good.
I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey
that sentiment.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> David.
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-05 18:36:26 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values |
| Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2008-03-05 18:30:33 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values |