Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date: 2008-03-04 05:43:02
Message-ID: 20080303214302.1272d4a2@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:33:08 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Added to TODO based on this discussion:
>
> o Allow pg_dump to utilize multiple CPUs and I/O channels by
> dumping multiple objects simultaneously
>
> The difficulty with this is getting multiple dump processes
> to produce a single dump output file.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php

Isn't part of this problem also a consistent snapshot?

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHzOFmATb/zqfZUUQRApqJAJ0ScecOzmcWqy86j/nfeMazL6JeZgCfWynT
xJ9EbtlMqSsYi6NNXTjaY7U=
=SI0h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-03-04 08:55:39 Re: Replacing the corrupt "global" folder with older one
Previous Message chris.jurado 2008-03-04 05:02:56 Replacing the corrupt "global" folder with older one