From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: partitioning using dblink |
Date: | 2008-03-03 17:30:26 |
Message-ID: | 200803031730.m23HUQ404094@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> writes:
> >>> I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any
> >>> errors,
> >>
> >> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a
> >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.
>
> > Is this a TODO? Seems so.
>
> I think it's just a minor bugfix, but if you want to put it in TODO for
> a day or two, go ahead...
That's fine --- I will just push it to the patches queue so we know it
is a live issue.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dmp | 2008-03-03 17:42:50 | PostgreSQL Array Use |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-03 17:29:06 | Re: partitioning using dblink |