From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.2.6 > 8.3 blows up |
Date: | 2008-03-02 23:15:57 |
Message-ID: | 20080302151557.3a3dfa7e@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:46:25 -0600
Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm not quite clear what I have to do in terms of if/when I can drop
> the old tsearch config stuff and for obvious reasons (like not
> running into this in the future) I'd like to. Can I just run the
> "untsearch2" script against those databases or will that destroy the
> search functionality? Are there changes necessary in the SQL code
> (the documentation implies not unless I'm doing "odd" things)
One of the goals for 8.3 and the integrated tsearch was to remove
exactly this problem.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHyzUtATb/zqfZUUQRAuyAAJ4vTqNjBvuNkyx2ygX55V3KPHxO+QCgl8yb
IAvNRUdlBg6G75KX9d95FiA=
=cqc6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl Denninger | 2008-03-02 23:20:30 | Re: 8.2.6 > 8.3 blows up |
Previous Message | Karl Denninger | 2008-03-02 21:46:25 | Re: 8.2.6 > 8.3 blows up |