From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to choose a disc array for Postgresql? |
Date: | 2008-03-02 08:05:35 |
Message-ID: | 20080302000535.5a6ae4b6@jd-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 23:37:37 -0800
"Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am moving our small business application
> database application supporting
> a 24/7 animal hospital to use 8.0.15 from
> 7.4.19 (it will not support 8.1, 8.2. or 8.3).
>
> Now, we can choose a new a disc array. SATA
> seems cheaper and you can get more discs but
> I want to stay with SCSI. Any good reasons to
> choose SATA over SCSI?
Sata is great if you need lots of space. SCSI/SAS is better if you want
lots of performance from a lesser amount of spindles.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2008-03-02 14:29:05 | Re: How to choose a disc array for Postgresql? |
Previous Message | Steve Poe | 2008-03-02 07:37:37 | How to choose a disc array for Postgresql? |