| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation |
| Date: | 2008-02-27 09:28:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20080227092819.GH5916@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:48:28PM -0600, Robert Lor wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> >I think both types of probes are useful to different people.
> >
> I think certain higher level probes can be really useful to DBAs.
> >Perhaps looking at the standard database SNMP MIB counters would give us a
> >place to start for upward facing events people want to trace for databases
> >in
> >general.
> >
> Great idea. I found this link for public RDBMS MIB
> http://www.mnlab.cs.depaul.edu/cgi-bin/sbrowser.cgi?HOST=&OID=RDBMS-MIB!rdbmsMIB
>
> The stats in rdbmsSrvInfoTable is quite useful, and it's one of the
> tables that Oracle implements in their SNMP support.
> http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/manage.1012/b16244/appdx_d_rdbms.htm
Incidentally, most of that's already supported by the pg snmp provider,
through the stats system.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-02-27 09:52:47 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-02-27 08:19:07 | Re: Two Coverity Scan volunteers needed |