| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
| Date: | 2008-02-26 20:43:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200802261543.41864.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 12:20, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > There are a lot of people who have a database provider of some sort who
> > creates a database for them, giving them ownership of that specific
> > database, with pg_hba.conf specifying connection only to that db. They
> > are then free to muck about that database, installing anything they want,
> > but they cannot load any procedural languages since they only have
> > non-superuser accounts. (This does give them access to plsql, but not
> > plpgsql).
>
> This is no longer true. Please read the whole thread.
>
Interesting, seems pghackers dropped me from the list, so I missed several
messages in the thread. While wrangling with majordomo, I had time to
reflect that we're still causing issues for setups where you aren't db owner,
though I dont know what the breakdown is for these types of setups. (Although
since many 3rd party apps try to run as unprivileged users, I'm sure it's
more of a pain than people think)
*shrug*
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-02-26 21:13:57 | Required make version |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2008-02-26 20:26:11 | Re: Two Coverity Scan volunteers needed |