Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-26 19:11:32
Message-ID: 200802261111.32931.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> That argument *was* valid ... before 8.3.  Nowadays non-superuser DB
> owners can install trusted PLs in their DBs by themselves.  (At least
> by default.)  So I'm still unconvinced that we need more changes.

I agree.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-02-26 19:17:24 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-26 19:08:31 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance