From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Usenet Gateway down.... for two weeks |
Date: | 2008-02-20 01:54:35 |
Message-ID: | 20080220015435.GL14892@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:39:39 -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > Looking into it ... odd thing is we used to have a mirror news
> > gateway out of France, which should have gave us the redundancy that
> > even if the primary were having gateway issues, the secondary would
> > have still been feeding articles ... will look into both sides ...
>
> Is there any kind of test we could put in place to make sure this
> doesn't happen again?
Agreed. Expecting to know about breakage just because someone complains
is no way to run a service.
> I mean I can't remember a single day in the last
> 5 years that hackers didn't get at least one message.
Well, in all likelyhood that would be a pretty unremarkable day, so if
it existed it wouldn't be a surprise that you wouldn't remember it.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-02-20 02:07:46 | Re: Usenet Gateway down.... for two weeks |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-02-20 01:52:35 | Re: Usenet Gateway down.... for two weeks |