Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "vincent" <vinny(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?
Date: 2008-02-20 05:00:04
Message-ID: 200802200000.04623.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday 04 February 2008 10:48, vincent wrote:
> > Christopher Browne wrote:
> >
> > Personally I'm surprised that the last couple responses seem to center
> > around not being able to make much money off of it. I agree that it
> > would require some time investment, but so did building PG in the first
> > place. Countless people have already sacrificed hours upon hours of
> > their time with no return on their investment except pride in their work
> > and a better overall product for everybody to use. I'm not a talented
> > enough programmer to contribute to the code, but in this way I can do
> > something to give back to the pg community.
> >
> > --
> > Tom Hart
>
> +1
>
> It seems there's a stalemate, apparently PgSQL needs to be more popular
> before authors want to write for it, and the public doesn't want to commit
> to a database that has only a handfull of books available.
>

Just to clarify, the market needs to expand to get publishers on board, not
authors.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2008-02-20 05:16:46 Re: Regex query not using index
Previous Message serafin segador 2008-02-20 04:59:32