Re: NetBSD/dtime_t

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NetBSD/dtime_t
Date: 2008-02-16 09:00:48
Message-ID: 20080216090048.GA6702@feivel.credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:07:17PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
>> Could anyone please tell me how NetBSD defines dtime_t? We have a
>> buildfarm failure on canary.
>
> /usr/include/sys/types.h says:
>
> typedef int32_t dtime_t; /* on-disk time_t */

Thanks. I wonder why they define this datatype. I didn't find it on any
other architecture.

Anyway, does anyone have a suggestion how to solve this issue? Informix
uses the dtime_t datatype to store a timestamp. pgtypeslib also defines
a timestamp type which is 64 bit and not 32 bit like the NetBSD one.
Informix compatibility now typedefs dtime_t to timestamp so the
functions with Informix syntax work as advertized.

If I do not define this datatype, Informix compatibility will not work,
if I define it, NetBSD is not able to compile to regression tests. Of
course we can work around the regression test problem, but a user using
the Informix compatibility feature on NetBSD will run into the same
problem.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-02-16 14:15:24 Re: NetBSD/dtime_t
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-16 02:35:24 PG-relevant bug fixes just pushed in Fedora 8