From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: end of life for pg versions... |
Date: | 2008-02-12 16:19:19 |
Message-ID: | 20080212161919.GC5073@crankycanuck.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:44:30AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
>
> That's why I wrote "without making it too formal" and "bland
> commitment to the release schedule...".
The problem with doing it that way is that, when the release fails to meet
the original target deadline, any coverage of a new release will inevitably
include notes remarks about how the release was "six months late" or
whatever. The computer press is driven mostly by commercial firms, who have
to have software schedules because that's how they pay their bills.
A
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2008-02-12 16:29:58 | Possible tiny issue with pg_dump.exe on windows |
Previous Message | Maarten Boekhold | 2008-02-12 16:04:01 | Re: WINDOWS INSTALLATION TIPS |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-02-12 16:32:21 | access to make changes to archives.postgresql.org, http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/subscribe |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-02-12 15:26:32 | Re: Mailing archive URL stability |