| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hervé Piedvache <bill(dot)footcow(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Kernel kills postgres process - help need |
| Date: | 2008-02-11 02:40:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20080211024010.GB8277@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hervé Piedvache escribió:
> Another, may be stupid question, but when you have several web nodes like
> me ... with several physical database (I'm not talking about replication,
> it's just that the web node can contact 3 or 4 differents database for
> differents applications), what is the best way to process with a pooler ...
> install one on each node or one on each database ?
I don't really know the answer to this, but if you have one per database
server, then all the web nodes are going to share the connections to
that database server.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-02-11 08:09:05 | Re: Is PG a moving target? |
| Previous Message | Pierre Thibaudeau | 2008-02-11 02:28:16 | Re: 8.3: where's the replacement tsearch2 module? |