Re: Is PG a moving target?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ken Johanson <pg-user(at)kensystem(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is PG a moving target?
Date: 2008-02-09 18:32:50
Message-ID: 20080209103250.036fcb4b@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:20:51 -0700
Ken Johanson <pg-user(at)kensystem(dot)com> wrote:

> I acknowledge that from time to time we must accept changes in the
> 3rd party software that will break our apps if we (or customers) ever
> upgrade them (a compounded issue if we have heavily-used deployments
> in the field and not just in-house ones to maintain).
>
> But given the recent and dramatic example of 8.3's on-by-default
> stricter typing in functions (now not-autocasting), I worry that kind
> of change could happen in every minor version (8.4 etc).

8.4 is a major release. 8.3.1 would be a minor release.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Willem Buitendyk 2008-02-09 18:42:37 pg_restore seems slow
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-09 18:08:49 Re: Is PG a moving target?