| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 21:08:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200802062208.09786.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le Wednesday 06 February 2008 21:35:54 Peter Eisentraut, vous avez écrit :
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Easy to update for Bruce -- for anyone else it is impossible to update
> > AFAIK.
>
> Yes, I feel we could use a group writeable patch queue of some sort.
> Perhaps an IMAP server setup could do the job.
I've read some developers appreciating the way review board works:
http://review-board.org/
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/UserBasics
This last link present the expected workflow when using the tool, and maybe
you'll find this matches the project needs... I don't know if such a tool can
help the project, but mentioning its existence certainly can't arm...
Hope this helps,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-02-06 21:10:46 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-02-06 21:07:06 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |