| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 23:59:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20080206155952.080a998b@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:50:34 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I've read some developers appreciating the way review board works:
> > http://review-board.org/
> > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
> > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/UserBasics
>
> Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it
> says is that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN. The
O.k. I am not too interested in starting a whole war here (again) but
for the record, we have what appears to be a perfectly working
capability to move from cvs to svn. So *if* review board is something
we really like, the SCM should not be the barrier.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-02-07 00:01:15 | Re: Page-at-a-time Locking Considerations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-06 23:50:34 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |