| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| Date: | 2008-02-04 19:11:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200802041111.11511.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
DVL,
> Any respectable certification must be subjective. You don't look at the
> person, think about it, and decide. There must be a subjective and
> independent test. To do otherwise greatly reduces the value of the
> certification.
I think you mean "objective".
Anyway, this is all fairly academic until Josh & Co. have at least one
certification exam at least halfway developed. At this point, I think
we've collected enough opinions on -advocacy; maybe we should let the exam
hackers do some work?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Langille | 2008-02-04 19:11:51 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| Previous Message | Hans-Juergen Schoenig | 2008-02-04 19:00:51 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Langille | 2008-02-04 19:11:51 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| Previous Message | Hans-Juergen Schoenig | 2008-02-04 19:00:51 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |