Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date: 2008-02-04 19:11:11
Message-ID: 200802041111.11511.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

DVL,

> Any respectable certification must be subjective. You don't look at the
> person, think about it, and decide. There must be a subjective and
> independent test. To do otherwise greatly reduces the value of the
> certification.

I think you mean "objective".

Anyway, this is all fairly academic until Josh & Co. have at least one
certification exam at least halfway developed. At this point, I think
we've collected enough opinions on -advocacy; maybe we should let the exam
hackers do some work?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2008-02-04 19:11:51 Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2008-02-04 19:00:51 Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2008-02-04 19:11:51 Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2008-02-04 19:00:51 Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification