From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Date: | 2008-01-31 14:20:54 |
Message-ID: | 20080131142054.GB7471@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard error,
> > rather than something people could override with -i.
+1 to this idea. TODO for 8.4?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-31 14:33:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-01-31 13:42:12 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-31 14:33:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-01-31 13:42:12 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |