From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |
Date: | 2008-01-31 08:39:55 |
Message-ID: | 20080131083955.GA8942@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:28:21AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 1:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > > Re-reading the thread ... could that last point be significant? Are
> > > all four of these boxen set to auto-accept updates from Redmond?
> >
> > No. red_bat does not auto-accept anything.
>
> For future reference, my BF members do auto-accept updates (though
> they only reboot if I tell them to). It seems like having red_bat do
> the opposite provides a useful baseline for tracking down future
> issues.
>
> I wonder if it would be worth adding a notes field to the BF so we can
> record this sort of detail...
+1. That should be interesting for non-win32 platforms as well... Assuming
it's not too much work, of course ;)
I have yet to see the first case where a windows update breaks PostgreSQL
in any way though, but once it happens it would be nice to have the info.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-01-31 08:42:56 | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-01-31 08:28:21 | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |