From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Nathan Wilhelmi" <wilhelmi(at)ucar(dot)edu> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Disk configurations.... |
Date: | 2008-01-25 03:10:20 |
Message-ID: | 20080124221021.9caffb9c.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nathan Wilhelmi" <wilhelmi(at)ucar(dot)edu>
> To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:21 PM
> Subject: [GENERAL] Disk configurations....
>
>
> > Hello - Typically case of a software guy needing to spec hardware for a
> > new DB server. Further typified case of not knowing exact amount of data
> > and I/O patterns. So if you were to spec a disk system for a new general
> > purpose PostgreSQL server any suggestions of what to start with?
> >
> > Details I have:
> >
> > 1) We think 500GB is enough storage for the DB.
> > 2) I would guess 66% read 33% write patterns, maybe closer to 50/50.
> >
> > I would assume that we would want to go SCSI raid. Would you do the
> > whole disk array as Raid 5 or whole you partition it up differently?
> > Would you go with 3x300gb disks or would you use more smaller disks to
> > get there?
Do NOT use RAID5. Use RAID 10. If you can afford it, get a SCSI RAID
controller with battery-backed cache and 15,000 RPM drives.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ow Mun Heng | 2008-01-25 03:49:03 | DB wide Vacuum(Goes thru readonly tables) vs Autovacuum |
Previous Message | Erik Jones | 2008-01-25 01:37:32 | Re: close connection |