Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c
Date: 2008-01-23 15:37:37
Message-ID: 20080123153737.GJ4815@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Well, if there is any such problem then it could be triggered by two
> independent plain-ol-REVOKE commands, so I still don't see an argument
> why shdepDropOwned is more at risk than anything else. I think we
> should just downgrade the lock.

Both issues fixed, thanks.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2008-01-23 15:58:48 Re: [HACKERS] Including Snapshot Info with Indexes
Previous Message Guillaume Smet 2008-01-23 14:33:55 Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2