From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? |
Date: | 2008-01-22 01:23:39 |
Message-ID: | 20080121192259.L8101@thebighonker.lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>>> would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat
>>> binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+).
>>
>> Depends on how big and ugly it is, I think. If you can do it just by
>> hacking CFLAGS and friends, sure; if it's as invasive as the Windows
>> build machinery, definitely not; in between, we'd have to see it.
>
> We've been through this once already. You can't do it (cleanly) with just
> Makefile hackery. The architectures have different endianness and possibly
> other ABI differences. To handle that cleanly you have to run configure once
> for each architecture and build each architecture with the appropriate
> config.h.
>
Could we then combine the executables into one 4-way fat binary ?
I'll see what I come up with.
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-22 02:33:26 | Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-01-22 00:20:34 | Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? |