Re: modularity of PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Hope Ho <ho(dot)hope(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: modularity of PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-01-17 23:14:46
Message-ID: 200801172314.m0HNEkU27830@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hope Ho wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have some questions about PostgreSQL's modularity. We know that
> PostgreSQL is famous for its good modularity, which allows users to
> select which part they need. It also allow developers to easily replace
> one part without affecting other parts. However, as I know, most
> database engine, like MySQL, has such modularity: layered architecture
> and small pieces of functionalities. Actually, it's a rule recognized
> by lots of software design. Why is only PostgreSQL entitled "good
> modularity"?

Because Postgres is modulare beyond the source code level. The modules
can be replaced without reprogramming the backend database, like
functions, triggers, operators, server-side languages, etc. And you can
even add new data types without having to modify the database backend
code.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-17 23:46:52 Re: modularity of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-17 23:10:16 Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal