Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful
Date: 2008-01-18 03:17:00
Message-ID: 20080117191700.47b79f3f@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:43:46 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > All this thread is a waste of time. We've previously agreed that
> > > we're going to store autovacuum per-table settings in
> > > pg_class.reloptions.
> >
> > I had forgotten that discussion. So the plan is for the
> > pg_autovacuum catalog to go away entirely, correct?
>
> Yup.
>
Wait .reloptions is a column... how are we going to populate it and
array?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHkBosATb/zqfZUUQRAru/AJ90HXXRHP17GmfzGa1I5nc34VCNGQCeM5Gb
6CeL1LyVZuOvYgG/OAoz7rw=
=EEuY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-18 03:19:28 Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-01-18 02:42:05 Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets