From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: User group liaison |
Date: | 2008-01-17 17:21:55 |
Message-ID: | 20080117092155.0c030ca4@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:12 -0800
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Regardless of what Josh's plans are, we really *could* use someone to
> be "in charge" of PUG websites, event communication, mailing lists,
> etc. This is something I've been doing up until now, and I'm often
> not terribly responsive when I'm travelling or involved with PR stuff.
>
> And since it's something I, personally, have been doing, I don't
> think I need a popular vote on whether to give the task to Selena,
> particularly when she volunteered and I've not seen anybody else do
> so. Whether Josh wants SPI-PUG funding requests to go through
> Selena or not is up to him, at least until the FG replaces him.
>
> Let's not turn PostgreSQL into a bureaucracy.
Which was never the intent. The *point* is what you say above plus
giving individual communities someone to talk to that has the answers.
Or if the person doesn't they know where to get them.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHj46zATb/zqfZUUQRAou+AJ0UiLMWX/QUmA7iRdfz6m944CVLogCgmGgM
f8VUtk83iTGEfoPasrp+mp4=
=sU5M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2008-01-17 17:27:08 | Re: User group liaison |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-01-17 17:16:57 | Re: User group liaison |