| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | GMail <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Colin Wetherbee <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INDEX on a composite type |
| Date: | 2007-12-20 10:38:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20071220103842.GC16113@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:41:36PM +0100, GMail wrote:
> By the way, why not allowing the declaration of an index over a composite
> type as a whole? (As opposed to a composite type as the list of single
> component types).
It would probably work if there was an operator class defined for your
type, but there's no magic for that.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
> -- John F Kennedy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2007-12-20 10:51:34 | Re: Quick Regex Question |
| Previous Message | Howard Cole | 2007-12-20 10:36:08 | Re: Quick Regex Question |