Re: top posting

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Collin Kidder" <adderd(at)kkmfg(dot)com>
Subject: Re: top posting
Date: 2007-12-12 00:38:21
Message-ID: 200712111938.21387.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 11 December 2007 16:11, Scott Marlowe wrote:
<snip>
> read the old
> messages in this thread, you'll see that I too said it was perfectly
> acceptable some times. Things like "Thanks, that solved it!" are fine
> top posted, although you really should crop the majority of the
> message you're replying to so as not to send a one liner on top of a
> 35k message.
>

Actually interesting point; one issue with top posting is that those who do it
tend to not trim appropriatly the messages they reply to (why would you if
your top posting). If you do trim accordingly, you're already at the bottom
of the email, and so bottom posting comes more naturally. *shrug*

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leigh Dyer 2007-12-12 00:38:51 Multiple clusters on one box for PITR
Previous Message Marc Munro 2007-12-12 00:36:31 Re: Oddity in column specifications for table creation