Re: whats the deal with -u ?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: whats the deal with -u ?
Date: 2007-12-11 03:34:10
Message-ID: 200712102234.11591.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 10 December 2007 10:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Further down the road, those whose notion of "intuitive" was formed
> by mysql might lobby to have -u become an alternate spelling for -U,

crontab, truss, sudo, ps, strace, top, etc...

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2007-12-11 03:43:14 Re: Problem of a server gettext message.
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-11 03:23:11 Re: Release Note Changes