From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Date: | 2007-12-09 19:00:03 |
Message-ID: | 200712091400.04006.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 09 December 2007 13:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> > 1) I don't recall why -u was ever deprecated (and honestly postgresql is
> > the only program I know which uses -U rather than -u) but maybe we should
> > revert to -u and deprecate -U instread?
>
> You appear to think that -u and -U are supposed to be equivalent.
> You are incorrect. -u forces prompts for username and password.
>
Ah, you're right, I didn't realize that (probably because nothing in the
warnings seem to indicate that). However I think all of my questions still
remain valid, if not becoming even further re-encforced:
rob(at)ridley:~$ ~rob/devel/postgresql/83/bin/psql -h localhost -u -p 5483
psql: Warning: The -u option is deprecated. Use -U.
If I wanted to prompt for a username, why is it telling me to use -U? If
we've deemed that's not a valid behavior to want, see questions 1,2 & 3 from
upthread :-)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-09 19:10:29 | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-09 18:33:15 | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |