From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Release Note Changes |
Date: | 2007-12-07 19:49:17 |
Message-ID: | 200712071949.lB7JnIM16165@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >> - Heap-Only Tuples (HOT) accelerate space reuse for UPDATEs
> >> change to
> >> "Heap-Only Tuples (HOT) improve performance of frequent UPDATEs"
> >>
> >
> > I used the original text because it tries to explain _how_ HOT improves
> > performance. The item that has the descriptive text explains how the
> > space reuse works. A generic "improve performance" doesn't seem like an
> > improvement.
> >
> >
> >
> I still think this needs to be qualified either way. As it stands it's
> quite misleading. Many update scenarios will not benefit one whit from
> HOT updates.
Doesn't the detail description qualify it enought? The heading isn't
suppose to have all the information or it would be unreadable.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-07 19:55:48 | Re: Release Note Changes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-07 19:47:22 | Re: Release Note Changes |