Re: Is postgres.gif missing in cvs?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Devrim =?iso-8859-1?q?G=DCND=DCZ?=" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is postgres.gif missing in cvs?
Date: 2007-12-05 11:08:09
Message-ID: 200712051208.12144.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> The particular
> cases that were biting Devrim seemed to all be occurrences of <>
> which perhaps is an allowed tag in his release.

<> means whatever the last opening tag was (much like </>). So it should
definitely be escaped.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-12-05 14:26:17 Re: Better default_statistics_target
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-12-05 10:41:52 Re: Release Note Changes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-12-05 14:26:17 Re: Better default_statistics_target
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-12-04 08:48:51 Re: Is postgres.gif missing in cvs?