| From: | Julian Mehnle <julian(at)mehnle(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bad query plans for queries on partitioned table |
| Date: | 2007-12-04 20:03:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200712042003.14121.julian@mehnle.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Julian Mehnle wrote:
> I have a large database with e-mail meta-data (no bodies) for over 100
> million messages. I am running PostgreSQL 8.2.4 on a server with 2GB
> of RAM (shared_buffers = 240MB, temp_buffers = 128MB, work_mem = 256MB,
> maintenance_work_mem = 256MB). I have the data split in two separate
> tables, "email" and "email_extras":
> [...]
>
> Each of these tables has been partitioned equally based on the "ts"
> (timestamp) field into two dozen or so tables, each covering one week
> of messages. For testing purposes, I have only one week's partition
> filled for each of the "email" and "email_extras" tables
> (email_2007_week34 {,extras}).
Oh, just for the record: I do have "constraint_exclusion" enabled.
Julian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Mansion | 2007-12-04 20:14:22 | Re: RAID arrays and performance |
| Previous Message | Julian Mehnle | 2007-12-04 19:44:08 | Bad query plans for queries on partitioned table |