From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)uiuc(dot)edu>, posgres support <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enhancement request |
Date: | 2007-12-02 01:31:14 |
Message-ID: | 20071202013114.GB11039@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:34:02 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> >
> > > The multi-worker autovacuum is a great new addition to help part of
> > > that problem (starvation) but it is not help against the other
> > > (resource consumption, specifically IO).
> >
> > Huh, autovac will consume exactly the same amount of I/O as a
> > user-induced vacuum, so I don't see your point.
>
> It can be determined "when" the I/O is used.
Future plans call for being able to change autovac parameters depending
on time of day, so you will be able to decide that using autovacuum too.
> > Remember, we're not adding VACUUM SCHEMA in 8.2 so it doesn't make any
> > sense to try to compare it against the old autovac. And you can bet
> > that in 8.4 autovac will have even more goodies.
>
> I assume you mean 8.3, but that is certainly a valid point.
No, I meant 8.4 --- the feature set of 8.3 is already set on stone. So
VACUUM SCHEMA has to compete with whatever we're able to do for the
release following that one.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"Entristecido, Wutra (canción de Las Barreras)
echa a Freyr a rodar
y a nosotros al mar"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Usama Dar | 2007-12-02 20:51:23 | Re: Enhancement request |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-01 20:30:29 | Re: Enhancement request |