From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? |
Date: | 2007-11-29 12:38:01 |
Message-ID: | 20071129123801.GI8718@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:19:44AM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:04:48PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > ie. if joshua(at)postgresql(dot)org sent out email, it would deliver to his local MTA,
> > with his local MTA connecting to postgresql.org MTA, who would then deliver it
> > out to the world ...
>
> Right. In the anti-spam world these days, very few people are doing reverse
> matching (that is, very few people compare the reverse lookup of the From:
> address to the domain of the MTA whence the mail is coming). It'll be
> interesting to see what happens as SPF or DKIM -- the two loaded foot-guns
> of the mail world -- take off, because then signing practices will start to
> be important, and I suspect we'll find that mail not signed with the right
> keys will all be classed as spam anyway. So then you'll _have_ to use the
> domain's own mail servers, or things won't be signed correctly (because I
> assume that we're not going to be sharing the server's private keys widely
> :-)
Yeah. I still don't see why you shouldn't be using the mailservers
belonging to the domain you're sending from.. ;-)
(Yes, I realise there's a bunch of people out there who don't want to, so
there's no need to re-iterate the fact that you don't)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-11-29 12:38:12 | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-29 12:25:48 | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? |