Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today

From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today
Date: 2007-11-28 23:09:38
Message-ID: 20071129000938.4088e9b0@iridium.wars-nicht.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:37:04 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:

> "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> writes:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:08:58 -0800 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Release 7.3.21 with and EOL addendum :). E.g; this is the last release
> >> of 7.3 and 7.3 is now considered unsupported.
>
> > I know at least one customer who is using RHEL-3 and PG 7.3 on dozens
> > machines worldwide.
>
> Are they running 7.3.20? Will they update to 7.3.21 promptly when we
> ship it? Or are they using whatever Red Hat includes in RHEL-3?
> (which is still 7.3.19 I believe)

I'm not sure, which micro version they are using right now. I only know,
they have 7.3.x, cause i already had to take care of this on some
projects.

> One of the reasons for losing interest in frequent updates is that
> it seems most of the people we hear from who are running 7.3.x are
> running a pretty obsolete "x". If we produce an update and no one
> actually installs it, we're just wasting time with make-work.

I said: we should not disband support of 7.3 today, release a final
version next week and that's it. Something like 3, 4 month of
pre-announce seems to be ok for me and i don't think, this makes much
difference.

Kind regards

--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
(Ferenc Mantfeld)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2007-11-28 23:17:05 Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2007-11-28 22:52:41 Re: quotas once again