| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Quality and Performance |
| Date: | 2007-11-27 18:04:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20071127180456.GC11978@crankycanuck.ca |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:32:49PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> What I would really like to persuade everybody is that performance needs
> specific attention.
[. . .]
> Your thoughts are welcome,
Well, one thing that might help is something of the specifics you mention.
I remember mentioning to Jan not long after he started at Afilias that we
occasionally saw strange behaviour that looked like "lock up". He was
slightly incredulous, and I didn't have time to build a repeatable test
case. So it was in the context of testing Slony that he discovered the dual
pains of buffer shuffling and checkpoint storms; this is part of what led
him to work on those problems in 8.0.
The key was to state, at the outset, "Here is the problem I want to fix."
By stating precisely and specifically what is to be fixed, the issue moves
from "performance needs" to a feature that can be implemented.
Perhaps now is the time to list some specific performance areas you want to
fix up?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
Old sigs will return after re-constitution of blue smoke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-27 18:08:22 | Re: Quality and Performance |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-11-27 18:04:08 | Re: psql -f doesn't complain about directories |