Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??
Date: 2007-11-16 19:17:28
Message-ID: 20071116191728.GB12131@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a
> > -t parameter. This does not seem to make sense to me. Is it correct?
> > Does it do anything?
> >
> > My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis.
>
> Well, Peter added it, but register already had the -w parameter, so
> either register needs both -t and -w, or it needs neither of them. I
> don't know which is true.

Humm, in pgwin32_CommandLine I don't see any reference to -t but -w is
there. So either

a) the bug is that somebody forgot to add -t to pgwin32_CommandLine
b) the bug is that -t was added to the synopsis, or
c) I'm full of it because of an untold reason.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"En las profundidades de nuestro inconsciente hay una obsesiva necesidad
de un universo lógico y coherente. Pero el universo real se halla siempre
un paso más allá de la lógica" (Irulan)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-11-16 19:54:13 Call for translations
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-11-16 19:07:26 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-16 22:58:23 Proposed patch for ANALYZE overcounting dead rows
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-16 17:38:08 Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??