Re: Tom thinks it's bad code was 8.3 vs 8.2 sql compatibility issue

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:17:21 -0600
Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:

> You guys really should keep such kind words to yourself.
> Not sure how in the hell you can say its bad code when it is just a
> little piece.

You pasted the entire SQL statement, that's how. It isn't hard to be
able to say, "Wow, that is a really bad piece of SQL" and frankly Tom
(not that he needs me to defend him) is one of the most (if not the
most) qualified people to make that statement on this list.

> You don't even know what it does.

Tony, it is obvious that you do not get the FOSS way of doing things
in the least.

If you post publicly something that is that ugly, then it is going to
get critiqued. It is that simple. You don't like it, don't post.

I have more than once taken my beatings on this list. It is time for
you to either grow a thicker skin or unsubscribe.

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHPMrkATb/zqfZUUQRAgyOAJ42Oy+3/UKmJ5IErZCnEJGcPIm2qgCeMX6p
s9+5JIvhxPAPNyIeX+7+LtI=
=j4lt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----