Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date: 2007-11-12 17:55:23
Message-ID: 20071112175523.GT1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:46:12AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:37 AM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> > And what's the performance hit of using native 64bit code? I'd guess
> > similar, moving twice as much data around with each pointer has got to
> > affect things.
>
> That's not been my experience. It's not like everything you do
> requires 64 bits to be moved where in 32 bit code only 32 were moved.
> The performance gain of the 64 bit machine doing 64 bit operations
> over the 32 bit machine doing them (i.e. floating point etc...) is so
> much more that it more than makes up for the overhead of running in 64
> bit mode.

OK, I'm willing to believe you. It used to be a big misunderstanding
that moving to 64bits automatically speed things up, things like this
change though.

Sam

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-12 18:22:21 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-11-12 17:51:33 Re: [HACKERS] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible?