| From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |
| Date: | 2007-11-12 17:55:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20071112175523.GT1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:46:12AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:37 AM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> > And what's the performance hit of using native 64bit code? I'd guess
> > similar, moving twice as much data around with each pointer has got to
> > affect things.
>
> That's not been my experience. It's not like everything you do
> requires 64 bits to be moved where in 32 bit code only 32 were moved.
> The performance gain of the 64 bit machine doing 64 bit operations
> over the 32 bit machine doing them (i.e. floating point etc...) is so
> much more that it more than makes up for the overhead of running in 64
> bit mode.
OK, I'm willing to believe you. It used to be a big misunderstanding
that moving to 64bits automatically speed things up, things like this
change though.
Sam
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-12 18:22:21 | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-12 17:51:33 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible? |