Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date: 2007-11-12 17:37:20
Message-ID: 20071112173720.GS1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:31:59AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:29 AM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> > You don't need a 32bit kernel to support 8GB of memory should you? As
> > long as the kernel supports PAE that should be enough to make use of it.
> > You only need a 64bit address space when each process wants to see more
> > than ~3GB of RAM.
>
> There's a performance hit for using PAE. Not sure what it is, but I
> recall it being the in the 5 to 10% range.

And what's the performance hit of using native 64bit code? I'd guess
similar, moving twice as much data around with each pointer has got to
affect things.

Sam

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wampler 2007-11-12 17:44:43 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-11-12 17:31:59 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance