Avoiding upgrade backlash

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Avoiding upgrade backlash
Date: 2007-11-12 22:42:30
Message-ID: 200711121442.31233.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs

Hackers,

I'm seeing from reports on IRC that 8.3 may cause an unprecedented number
of upgrade issues for users who have old, badly-written applications.
Stefan K, for example, was reporting the necessity of re-writing 3000
lines of his PL/pgSQL code on an older app (about 10%).

While we are right to choke down abuse of implicit casting, it might be a
good idea to give users stronger warnings and instructions.

I'm thinking that we need to warn everyone about:
1) They need to use 8.3's pg_dump, not the old version, to upgrade (this is
always true but now doing it wrong will break a lot more users).
2) They need to check for bugs
3) If Robert gets his type-cast backport package together, the location of
that.

I'm thinking this warning should go (prominently) into the release notes,
the community notice, and the extended web release.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-12 23:04:12 Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-11-12 17:26:06 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wiki change (oops)

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-12 23:04:12 Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-12 17:56:56 Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix