From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Avoiding upgrade backlash |
Date: | 2007-11-12 22:42:30 |
Message-ID: | 200711121442.31233.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs |
Hackers,
I'm seeing from reports on IRC that 8.3 may cause an unprecedented number
of upgrade issues for users who have old, badly-written applications.
Stefan K, for example, was reporting the necessity of re-writing 3000
lines of his PL/pgSQL code on an older app (about 10%).
While we are right to choke down abuse of implicit casting, it might be a
good idea to give users stronger warnings and instructions.
I'm thinking that we need to warn everyone about:
1) They need to use 8.3's pg_dump, not the old version, to upgrade (this is
always true but now doing it wrong will break a lot more users).
2) They need to check for bugs
3) If Robert gets his type-cast backport package together, the location of
that.
I'm thinking this warning should go (prominently) into the release notes,
the community notice, and the extended web release.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-12 23:04:12 | Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-11-12 17:26:06 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wiki change (oops) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-12 23:04:12 | Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-12 17:56:56 | Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix |