Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

From: Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Date: 2007-11-11 13:10:27
Message-ID: 200711111410.27946.albert@nan-tic.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

A Diumenge 11 Novembre 2007, Tom Lane va escriure:
> I think there's a case for putting these pages under Part V Server
> Programming (though a few are not in fact server-side code), or under
> Part VI Reference (ignoring the fact that most of the text isn't in a
> uniform reference-page style ... though maybe we could plan to work
> towards that) or under Appendixes (though I'm sure there are people
> who will complain about that because their private agenda is to make
> these things as prominent as possible). Or we could make them a new
> top-level Part, probably just after Reference.
>

That's where I put them initialy AFAIR but somebody complained they should be
in the Reference. Maybe if we now agree that's not the appropiate place we
can move them to a new Part.

--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-11-11 13:11:50 Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix
Previous Message Albert Cervera i Areny 2007-11-11 13:05:19 Re: Contrib docs v1