Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto
Date: 2007-11-11 03:45:48
Message-ID: 200711110345.lAB3jm616047@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > >> OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
> > >> Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
> >
> > > Why reinstall if the functions come from dump?
> >
> > > At least in skype we stumbled on the problem. But if the reinstall
> > > is widespread practice, then indeed it may not be worth bothering.
> >
> > If you don't re-run a contrib module's sql script then you don't get any
> > new functions that may have been added to the module. So I think the
> > real issue here is that we ought to deprecate the idea of skipping that
> > step, period.
>
> When did we ever promote such a skipping idea? Seems we need to add
> some documentation for this. Once we get the /contrib docs moved to
> SGML I can add something.

Documentation added.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-11 03:48:44 Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-11 03:45:18 Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto