Re: "Resurrected" data files - problem?

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Resurrected" data files - problem?
Date: 2007-11-08 16:36:24
Message-ID: 200711080836.24614@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 08 November 2007, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
wrote:
> Can you give me a good reason why?
>
> > Try re-reading the instructions on backup in the manual.
>
> I know them well. That is why I ask if this questionable procedure
> could lead to damage.

You cannot backup a live database with a filesystem backup and expect it to
work afterwards, unless you take all the steps required to produce a PITR
base backup.

It's not even "questionable". It's a fundamental misunderstanding of what is
required to backup a database.

--
Peak Oil is now accepted as inevitable, and the debate only becomes as
to when - James Schlesinger, former US Secretary of Energy

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2007-11-08 17:02:04 Re: Calculation for Max_FSM_pages : Any rules of thumb?
Previous Message Kevin Neufeld 2007-11-08 16:29:26 Re: System V IPC on Windows